Comments on: Wintergrasp Imbalance

By: Led tube

Led tube — Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:26:44 +0000

Thanks for your share this content ,it was really nice ,we are professional manufacturer that produce the led tube ,led panel light ,led display ,thank you so much again !if any new question ,can i visit here again? by the way , pls visit our websites:Led tube

By: 4Story Gold

4Story Gold — Fri, 27 May 2011 09:12:07 +0000

very good article,thans for your sharing

By: Myyra

Myyra — Thu, 02 Sep 2010 04:19:35 +0000

Better players win more. Don’t suck so much and you’ll win. In other words learn some coordination and maybe, just maybe you’ll win Wintergrasp once or twice….

By: Kendar

Kendar — Fri, 13 Aug 2010 04:25:40 +0000

On Zenedar its the same problem. Alliance is almost gone and completely outnumbered by the horde. Usually in WG we have 10-15 stacks of Tenacity. We won maybe 2-3 battles in the past 2 weeks.
The numbers are so unbalanced that even during nighttime we still have 4+ stacks.

As this is a batle field now, the numbers should be capped on both sides to ensure a balanced fight. With the new queueing method of entering, this shouldn’t be a problem.

By: Daken

Daken — Mon, 26 Jul 2010 04:12:17 +0000

On my server the alliance supposedly outnumber horde 3:1 (last time I checked wowsensus). In the early days of WG it was actually fun, it seemed to be that both sides had relatively equal numbers and this translated to a relatively equal win/loss record. Both factions had relatively equal access to the loot piñatas.

Something seemed to happen about 5-6 months ago, and it was like the Alliance on my server lost interest in WG. Now it’s not unusual to jump into WG to find that you have 5+ stacks of tenacity and the horde are already camping the graveyards.

So the problem on my server now is that while the alliance outnumber the horde in terms of population, the alliance just don’t turn up to WG anymore.

By: prisonplanet

prisonplanet — Tue, 06 Jul 2010 19:09:14 +0000

To “Moredekai”

This is exactly why the imbalance exists, and will NOT be fixed by ANY means whatsoever…faction change generates more money.

Blizzard is and has been one of the most crooked and greedy gaming companies out there since induction of their name into the industry.

They’ll sell you the next expansion which is comprised of already created materials that were supposed to be phased in with patches, at $50.

Do you like how in “Print” you can buy a 60 day prepaid card and it’s only good for 25 days because of maintenance days that almost always seem to extend themselves further ? That is just flat out false advertisement.

The most important issue I believe is the inability to prevent pedophiles from interaction with children. They’ll put in all kinds of security measures to ensure you dont get hacked (so you can pay your subscription, giving THEM money)….but not being able to put in security that denies pedophiles access to sign up for one.

By: Beau

Beau — Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:18:55 +0000

I could never change my Alliance characters to Horde just beacuse of Wintergrasp, however we are also outnumbered in The Ventrue Co.

WG is only 1 bg from the many.. there are so mmuch others that we own almost always.

By: Aristos

Aristos — Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:15:51 +0000

Good points. I’m on EU-Zenedar and there were free transfers for horde to the realm. Now like yourself, WG is completely overrun. The population imbalance should not have such a major impact on my chances at downing Toravon (twice a week per char). Maybe not an exact match, but if they limited each faction to have a maximum of 10% or 20% more in the battle (40 alliance = max 44 horde) then tenacity would have an greater affect.

By: MaskMan

MaskMan — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 23:24:23 +0000

Most of you obviously don’t come from unbalanced servers. I happen to come from a server that has WAY more Alliance.

We win WG a handful of times a week, it’s pretty sick. We’ve had many matches were the tenacity is 20, but that just means we are so greatly outnumbers and have NO CHANCE. If Blizz simply posted the win % of each server along with the population % of each fraction it would be obvious what’s going on. Instead I believe they are satisfied that what they are doing works on “most” servers and are happy to countdown the days to the exp with things as is.

Some spoke that they can kill 20 allies with all that tenacity, but, it doesn’t work like that, you have 10 allies attack you, one or two of them stun you and boom, next thing you know you are dead. The tenacity is a worthwhile tool when the fractions are semi-close in size, not when one side greatly outnumbers the other.

The funny part is that I thought this was normal:

Faction starts with the Sunken Ring and Broken Temple Factories under their control and gains access to Catapults, Siege Engines, and Demolishers after earning 1 kill in battle.

I’m only now finding out that it only happens after you’ve lost like 7 WGs in a row.

By: Giselle

Giselle — Mon, 01 Mar 2010 03:26:06 +0000

My first thought on seeing the first two paragraphs was “Bullshit, this is QQ.” And then I read through the 3 reasons, and it DOES make sense and is well-reasoned out and explained.

To the idiots just spamming “QQ moar” in these comments, you obviously didn’t read the entire article, did you? I hear reading before posting makes you look less of an idiot. If you think it’s mindless QQ, then actually post intelligent arguments that rebut each point he made, instead of mouth-breathing here.